Robots in orthopedic surgery are emerging and increasingly popular, and have a significant role in improving surgical planning, improving implant accuracy, and increasing patient safety. Proponents of robotic assisted systems believe that computer-assisted surgery allows for better preoperative planning and intraoperative procedures to improve patient outcomes.
In response to the above situation, Professor Karthik of England conducted a literature review on the effectiveness and safety of current robotic surgery using orthopedics. His research was published in the recent issue of thebone&jointjournal.
Orthopaedic surgery is one of the earliest departments to carry out clinical experimental robotic surgery. The use of surgical robots is increasing, which can bring good short-term effects. Since the human body can be fixed, the orthopedic robot does not need to face the problem of pulling the internal organs and soft tissues, which is more convenient for navigation and positioning.
Proponents of robotic surgery believe that the use of this system can help doctors improve the conversion process from preoperative planning to intraoperative procedures, thereby improving the accuracy of the procedure. However, there are some studies that have found that robotic surgery increases the incidence of complications. In this literature review, we studied the current use of robotic surgery in orthopedic surgery and evaluated its effects.
All the literatures between 1966 and June 2014 were independently and independently searched by the two authors. Establish inclusion and exclusion criteria. The initial search found 15053 articles, of which 143 were related to orthopedic surgery, and 44 were in accordance with the inclusion criteria of the study. The results of the study were included in the study and subgroup analyses were performed by category.
Inclusion of standard exclusion criteria: Robot-assisted/surgical repetitive literature in orthopedic surgery can be used to obtain orthopedic surgery (such as computer-aided or navigational surgery) without full-active robots. English literature expert opinions, letters to magazine editors, or case reports are targeted at animals. The experimental study lost the rate of more than 30%.
Literature Review
Knee joint
In 2012, more than 94,000 knee replacement surgeries were performed throughout England, Wales and Northern Ireland. The cumulative revision rate of the total knee joint during the 8-year period was 3%, and the revision rate of the single-knee knee replacement was 11%. The most common cause of joint replacement failure is aseptic loosening, where poor placement of prosthetic components is the main cause of aseptic loosening. Robot-assisted knee replacement surgery may reduce the incidence of prosthesis loosening and revision.
Customized Laboratory Testing Instruments
Wuxi Lerin New Energy Technology Co.,Ltd. , https://www.lerin-tech.com